Los economistas Ronald Balza, Tamara Herrera y María Antonieta Moreno participaron en un foro titulado '¿Dolarización en Venezuela?' realizado el martes 15 de septiembre en la Universidad Católica Andrés Bello (UCAB).

Balza, decano de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales de la UCAB, señaló que el ahorro depende de la brecha entre ingresos y gastos, no de la moneda utilizada.

El panel citó ventajas de corto plazo de la dolarización formal: eliminar el riesgo de emisión de dinero local y la devaluación del bolívar.

Entre las desventajas citadas se incluyen la pérdida total de la política monetaria, la desaparición del señoreaje y la incapacidad del BCV para actuar como prestamista de última instancia, además de la necesidad de grandes reservas internacionales de las que el país carece actualmente.

Análisis disponible en inglés — traducción revisada próximamente.

This is a report of an academic panel discussion, not a policy announcement or a data release. El Pitazo, an independent Venezuelan digital outlet whose profile is rated B with a caveat of uneven regional coverage, is relaying what three economists said at a forum titled '¿Dolarización en Venezuela?' held Tuesday, September 15 at Universidad Católica Andrés Bello (UCAB) in Caracas. The signal's value lies in the identity and institutional position of the speakers rather than in any new measurement: Ronald Balza is dean of UCAB's Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, and he appears alongside Tamara Herrera and María Antonieta Moreno. The framing question in the headline — whether dollarization automatically rescues purchasing power — is answered in the negative by the panel's central argument, which is a conceptual claim about savings rather than an empirical estimate.

The epistemic status of the elements differs sharply. Balza's statement that savings depend on the gap between income and spending, not on the currency used, is the only claim in the set with internal evidentiary weight: it carries an evidence_count of 12, meaning the article itself contains twelve matching records supporting it. The other two claims — the fact of the forum and the panel's citation of short-term advantages of formal dollarization, namely eliminating local money emission risk and devaluation of the bolívar — have an evidence_count of 0, which means our corpus has no matching record for them inside this article; it does not mean they are uncorroborated in the world. Our own per-claim corroboration probe cannot yet tell whether two sources report the same claim (0 of 24,929 claim keys cross sources, measured 2026-09-13), so we cannot yet check these assertions against other outlets. The distinction matters: the panel's cited advantages are attributed positions, not verified outcomes, and should be read as the economists' framing rather than as established effects.

What would change this assessment is observable and time-bound. A formal dollarization plan or an official conversion rate for the bolívar announced by the Banco Central de Venezuela or the Venezuelan government would move the question from academic debate to policy fact, and is checkable within 90 days via BCV announcements or the Gaceta Oficial. Alternatively, a follow-up forum or report on dollarization from UCAB with the same panelists would indicate the discussion is part of a sustained institutional track rather than a single event, checkable within 90 days via the UCAB website or El Pitazo's events coverage. Until one of those appears, the appropriate reading is that this is a credentialed but non-binding expert signal: it clarifies the analytical terms of the dollarization debate — currency versus income-spending gap — without settling whether dollarization would in practice restore purchasing power.

The claims, made testable

• asserted — check unavailable Economists Ronald Balza, Tamara Herrera and María Antonieta Moreno spoke at a forum titled '¿Dolarización en Venezuela?' held Tuesday, September 15 at Universidad Católica Andrés Bello (UCAB). (evidence: not measured)
• matches in our corpus (not independent) Balza, dean of UCAB's Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, said savings depend on the gap between income and spending, not on the currency used.
• asserted — check unavailable The panel cited short-term advantages of formal dollarization: eliminating local money emission risk and devaluation of the bolívar. (evidence: not measured)

Pattern: 138 related Venezuela signals in the last 30 days on dollarization, purchasing power, monetary policy, Venezuelan economy.

What would change the assessment

• The BCV or Venezuelan government announces a formal dollarization plan or official conversion rate for the bolívar (within 90 days — BCV official announcements / Gaceta Oficial)
• UCAB publishes a follow-up forum or report on dollarization with the same panelists (within 90 days — UCAB website / El Pitazo events coverage)

Grounded analysis — deterministic intelligence + AI synthesis anchored to real signals (deterministic + anchored deepseek-chat). No fact is asserted that the sources do not support.

Qué establecen las fuentes

• Balza, decano de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales de la UCAB, dijo que el ahorro depende de la brecha entre ingresos y gastos, no de la moneda utilizada.

Actores nombrados en fuentes

Ronald Balza · Tamara Herrera · María Antonieta Moreno · Universidad Católica Andrés Bello · Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales de la UCAB · Banco Central de Venezuela

Haga clic en un actor para ver otros informes que lo mencionen.

Lo que aún no se puede ver

• Todo lo anterior es el relato de un solo medio; nada está corroborado de forma independiente todavía.